Купить телевизор
Dec. 12th, 2003 03:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kikaВот такая вот фигня. Миллионы лет эволюции, а старые добрые трубки до сих пор рулят.
Plasmas are much heavier and get too hot generally - and susceptibility to screen burn is terrible. DVD's and anything MPEG2 look variably somewhere between passable from a distance to absolutely bloody awful on them, although I think the manufacturers could get better results in this department if they took care with the filtering algorithms. Experience shows that very often a coded analog signal (Y/C at least) looks better on a plasma than component - presumably due to some analog "interpolation" and softening of the edges!- dependent of course on your source material.
The main problem with LCD's as with DLP projection at the moment is the blacks - but they are getting there slowly.
Having said all this, if I wanted a new big telly right now I'd get a CRT one - on the assumption that next time I'll be able to get one that will hang on the wall without pulling the wall down, and that doesn't stay switched off because I can't bare to look at the blocky, solarized and burnt picture of an evening or ruing the loss of shadow detail after staring at proper Grade 1's during the day.
Cheers,
Richard
Mark Quod wrote:
> I know this is a bit off topic, but I am in the market for a new TV at home. I was wondering thoughts you guys had on what kinds are good or not good--image quality being most important not bells and whistles. Sometimes it's hard to read between the marketing gimmicks lines. I'm leaning towards getting a 36" CRT television. Thanks,Mark
Plasmas are much heavier and get too hot generally - and susceptibility to screen burn is terrible. DVD's and anything MPEG2 look variably somewhere between passable from a distance to absolutely bloody awful on them, although I think the manufacturers could get better results in this department if they took care with the filtering algorithms. Experience shows that very often a coded analog signal (Y/C at least) looks better on a plasma than component - presumably due to some analog "interpolation" and softening of the edges!- dependent of course on your source material.
The main problem with LCD's as with DLP projection at the moment is the blacks - but they are getting there slowly.
Having said all this, if I wanted a new big telly right now I'd get a CRT one - on the assumption that next time I'll be able to get one that will hang on the wall without pulling the wall down, and that doesn't stay switched off because I can't bare to look at the blocky, solarized and burnt picture of an evening or ruing the loss of shadow detail after staring at proper Grade 1's during the day.
Cheers,
Richard
Mark Quod wrote:
> I know this is a bit off topic, but I am in the market for a new TV at home. I was wondering thoughts you guys had on what kinds are good or not good--image quality being most important not bells and whistles. Sometimes it's hard to read between the marketing gimmicks lines. I'm leaning towards getting a 36" CRT television. Thanks,Mark
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 12:52 pm (UTC)Например совершенно неприемлемо когда аудиотракт способен воспроизвести менее 44кгц. (ну а то что не звучит и шумы квантования слышны даже глухому - так кого это ебет-то? Зато стенку вокруг не видно).
FYI: правильный проектор стоит 70K. Это не совсем home solution, мягко говоря не для всех.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 02:02 pm (UTC)Так что запасайтесь :-)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-12 01:19 pm (UTC)